Breadcrumb

The effect of clock changes on energy consumption in UK buildings

The effect of clock changes on energy consumption in UK buildings

The report looks at the impact of changing UK clocks from GMT to British Summer Time on energy use, compared to adopting Central European Time (CET).

The issue of clock changes has been raised as a potential way of reducing carbon emissions. An earlier study concentrated on modelling the expected impact of the clock change on the likelihood of artificial lighting being switched off in response to daylight availability. The work presented here expands on this earlier work and looks at the impact of clock change on energy use for lighting, heating and cooling using dynamic simulation modelling to capture the interactions between the energy services. This report was prepared for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) and published by BRE in 2005.

Key findings

  • It is unlikely that the a switch to either Central European Time (BBST/DBST), or BST all year round (BST/BST) would lead to significant CO2 savings.

  • Both clock change regimes would result in an increase in energy consumption in UK buildings, rather than realise any savings.

  • Overall the changes result in only a small difference to energy for heating, lighting and cooling in UK buildings and were similar for 2010 and 2020.

  • The only instances where savings are realised are for domestic lighting and non-domestic cooling for the switch to Central European Time, but these would be outweighed by other effects.

Report summary

Simulations were used to determine the impact of a clock change on annual energy consumption for heating, and in the case of non-domestic buildings for lighting and cooling as well.

The modelling results were scaled to the UK level for 2010 and 2020 based the projected energy consumption for the reference scenarios developed for the domestic and non-domestic sectors.

The result of this study indicate that both clock change regimes would result in an increase in energy consumption in UK buildings, rather than realise any savings. Overall the changes result in only a small difference to energy for heating, lighting and cooling in UK buildings and were similar for 2010 and 2020. The switch to Central European Time (BBST/DBST) showing 2% increase in both delivered energy use and CO2 emissions (around 40 PJ and 2.5 M Tonnes CO2, respectively). Whilst a switch to BST all year round (BST/BST) would result in a smaller increase of just under 1% (around 20 PJ and 3 5 M Tonnes CO2, respectively).

The only instances where savings are realised are for domestic lighting and non-domestic cooling for the switch to Central European Time. However, these savings are more than offset by the increases in non-domestic heating and lighting, as well as a small increase in domestic heating.

As these results are based on a limited number of simulations, there is uncertainty associated with the final figures. However, it is unlikely that the a switch to either Central European Time (BBST/DBST), or BST all year round (BST/BST) would lead to significant CO2 savings.

Get in touch Shortform

Read the full report

For all the findings and recommendations from our research into false fire alarms, read the full report.

Asset Publisher

Asset Publisher

Related Articles

Related Articles

Asset Publisher

Statement about public notice for solar rooftop system “health checks”
Solar power

Statement about public notice for solar rooftop system “health checks”

BREEAM publishes resource to support ENERGY STAR® users
Energy

BREEAM publishes resource to support ENERGY STAR® users

BRE comments on the Chancellor’s fiscal statement September 2022
Energy efficiency

BRE comments on the Chancellor’s fiscal statement September 2022